Document Type: Forwarded Email Thread (July 2016)
Original File: `DEEPAK/Evidence/PDF/EFTA00824237.pdf`
On July 7, 2016, Deepak Chopra forwarded an aggressive intellectual debate to Jeffrey Epstein, noting that he was "Sharing privately" and providing it "Just FYI." The thread features physicists debating the merits of Chopra's scientific claims.
From: Deepak Chopra
To: Jeff Epstein
Subject: Fwd: What's wrong with Deepak?
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 16:20:35 +0000
Sharing privately
Just FYI
Brian is a Nobel Laureate in Physics
Cavendish Prof in Cambridge England
Involved in mind / matter unification
Deepak Chopra
Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wellbeing
Begin forwarded message:
From: Deepak Chopra
Date: July 7, 2016 at 12:15:15 PM EDT
To: [Multiple Recipients including Stuart Hameroff, Gary Zukav, Nick Herbert, Alan Wolf]
Subject: Re: What's wrong with Deepak?
Quantum Physics is a model of reality created in consciousness . All models are modes of thinking knowing perceiving .
QM is a mathematical model created in human consciousness .
It cannot explain consciousness in the way a piano cannot explain Mozart or the ink in a book explain the mind of Shakespeare .
You don't need to be a physicist to know that !
Deepak Chopra
On Jul 7, 2016, at 12:09 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
PS
Stay focussed on topic Brian.
Your emotional reaction is clouding your critical judgement.
The fact that you think that Karen Barad's theory of "queer atoms" is the new paradigm is evidence of that. ;-)
Personally, I like Deepak he is able to take my punches.
However, the real issue here is what he says about consciousness in relation to quantum physics.
That is what is important.
On Jul 7, 2016, at 9:05 AM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
So Brian should we assume that you fully agree to everything Deepak says about quantum physics?
On Jul 7, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Brian Josephson wrote:
On 6 Jul 2016, at 23:10, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Deepak is arrogant, smug and clueless at the same time.
He has his Ego invested in keeping consciousness a mystery.
Brian Josephson's response:
And Jack himself isn't arrogant or smug? You could have fooled me!!
Jack Sarfatti's reply:
No I am not. I am simply honest in my opinions. I have little tolerance for clueless fools who corrupt the public understanding of science.
Brian Josephson continues:
Perhaps a bit of narcissism... That's what "celebrity nut jobs" do. ;-)
And as for ego, sending photos of oneself to people who haven't indicated any wish to follow every movement of the person concerned is a pretty good indicator of ego it seems to me.
Brian
Brian D. Josephson
EFTA00824237
This document is a prime example of the "intellectual grooming" and social validation Epstein received from his high-profile associates.